Ambassador Femi Fani-Kayode has formally rejected the alleged award of the Senior Counsel of Nigeria (SCN) title – commonly called “Blue Silk” – saying he never authorised its acceptance.
Fani-Kayode denies authorisation
In a statement released on November 6, 2026, his Special Assistant on Media, Lizzy Okoji, said staff members attended the Nigerian Law Society’s 2026 Annual General Conference in Abuja on his behalf. The communiqué was distributed to national news agencies and posted on the ambassador’s official portal later that day.
Okoji clarified that the invitation was sent to his office while he was engaged in official duties, but the subsequent communication implying his acceptance was not approved by the ambassador.
The statement quoted him as “His Excellency wishes to categorically state that he did not personally authorise or approve the acceptance of the said designation and hereby formally disassociates himself from the purported conferment.”
During the conference, Okoji delivered a speech presented as Fani-Kayode’s remarks, calling for equal access to justice regardless of social standing, wealth or political connections.
He also referenced his diplomatic role in South Africa and his commitment to protecting Nigerians facing challenges there, recalling a town-hall meeting with the diaspora shortly after his appointment.
Later, the ambassador reiterated that neither his representation at the event nor any communication on his behalf should be read as personal endorsement of the SCN title.
Read Also: NARD Rejects Senate’s Jail Threat for Doctors Over Emergency Delays
Legal backdrop to the Blue Silk debate
Fani-Kayode’s rejection highlighted concerns about the legal and professional implications of the Blue Silk award, especially in light of the Federal High Court’s judgment that dismissed attempts to treat it as an alternative rank to Senior Advocate of Nigeria.
The controversy reflects a broader tension between professional bodies that seek to recognise specialised legal work and the statutory framework that reserves senior ranks for titles conferred by the Legal Practitioners’ Privileges Committee.
The Society maintains that its internal awards celebrate merit without altering the formal hierarchy established by law.
The Legal Practitioners’ Privileges Committee has warned that the Blue Silk title lacks statutory recognition and has cautioned legal practitioners about its possible professional and disciplinary implications.
The court issued a perpetual injunction restraining the Association of Legislative Drafting and Advocacy Practitioners and Dr Tonye Jaja from conferring the Blue Silk rank or any related title not recognised under the Legal Practitioners Act.
Professional bodies’ positions
The Society maintains that internal recognition of members does not require statutory endorsement, asserting that the award serves as an honor rather than a rank. It pointed out that many professional groups use similar titles to motivate members.
Judicial outcomes and ongoing debate
The court’s decision clarified that the statutory framework does not recognize the Blue Silk designation as a senior rank, and the authority to confer the rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria is vested in the Legal Practitioners’ Privileges Committee.
Leave a Reply